Characteristics and course of patients with AA amyloidosis: single centre experience with 174 patients from Turkey.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, laboratory and genetic characteristics and outcomes of patients with AA amyloidosis. METHODS: Patients followed up in a tertiary referral centre in Turkey with the diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and immunohistologically proven AA amyloidosis were included in the study and retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Among 184 patients with the diagnosis of AA amyloidosis, 174 (83 female, 91 male) were included in the analysis. The most common cause of AA amyloidosis was FMF (78.7%), and 91% of FMF-AA amyloidosis patients were carrying the p.M694V variant (74.1% homozygous). AA amyloidosis was identified earlier in patients with homozygous or compound heterozygous MEFV exon 10 variants compared with the heterozygous patients (27, 30 and 41 years, respectively). Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min at admission had a higher frequency of progression to end-stage renal disease (P < 0.001). The overall mortality rate was 15.3% and it increased gradually in association with the amyloid burden (10% in patients with renal, 15% in renal + gastrointestinal and 43% in those with additional cardiac involvement). Renal findings responded completely to treatment in 31% of the patients, a partial response was observed in 4%, a stable course in 23.6% and progression in 38.5%. Amyloid storm was identified in nine patients and was found to be associated with increased mortality within 1 year. CONCLUSION: FMF patients still constitute the majority of AA amyloidosis patients in Turkey. The MEFV genotype and associated inflammatory load may affect the age of onset of AA amyloidosis, and earlier diagnosis and stricter follow-up and treatment may delay progression of the disease.

Criteria for Hyperinflammation Developing in COVID-19: Analysis of 2 Cohorts From Different Periods of the Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperinflammation (HI) that develops in week 2 of COVID-19 contributes to a worse outcome. Because week 2 laboratory findings can be relatively mild, the available criteria for classification of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis or macrophage activation syndrome are not helpful. METHODS: Our study included a discovery cohort of patients from Turkey with symptomatic COVID-19 who were followed up while hospitalized during the initial wave and a replication cohort of hospitalized patients from a later period, all of whom required oxygen support and received glucocorticoids. Diagnosis of HI was made by an expert panel; most patients with COVID-19-associated HI (HIC) received tocilizumab or anakinra. Clinical and laboratory data from start day of treatment with tocilizumab or anakinra in HIC patients were compared with the data from day 5-6 in patients without HIC. Values maximizing the sensitivity and specificity of each parameter were calculated to determine criteria items. RESULTS: The discovery cohort included 685 patients, and the replication cohort included 156 patients, with 150 and 61 patients receiving treatment for HI, respectively. Mortality rate in HI patients in the discovery cohort (23.3%) was higher than the rate in patients without HI (3.7%) and the rate in patients in the overall replication cohort (10.3%). The 12-item criteria that we developed for HIC showed that a score of 35 provided 85.3% sensitivity and 81.7% specificity for identification of HIC. In the replication cohort, the same criteria resulted in 90.0% sensitivity for HIC; however, lower specificity values were observed because of the inclusion of milder cases of HIC responding only to glucocorticoids. CONCLUSION: The use of the 12-item criteria for HIC can better define patients with HIC with reasonable sensitivity and specificity and enables an earlier treatment start.

Frequency and severity of COVID-19 in patients with various rheumatic diseases treated regularly with colchicine or hydroxychloroquine.

This study aimed to investigate whether patients regularly using colchicine or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have an advantage of protection from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or developing less severe disease. Patients who were taking colchicine or HCQ regularly for a rheumatic disease including Familial Mediterranean Fever, Behçet's syndrome, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Sjogren's syndrome, as well as their healthy household contacts as the control group, were included in the study. The clinical data regarding COVID-19 were collected using a standard form, and serum samples were analyzed for anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) nucleocapsid immunoglobulin G (IgG). A total of 635 regular colchicine users with their 643 household contacts and 317 regular HCQ users with their 333 household contacts were analyzed. Anti-SARS-COV-2 IgG was positive in 43 (6.8%) regular colchicine users and 35 (5.4%) household contacts (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.8-2; p = 0.3). COVID-19-related symptoms were described by 29 (67.4%) of the patients and 17 (48.6%) household contacts (OR = 2.2; 95% CI :0.9-5.5; p = 0.09), and hospital admission was observed in five (11.6%) and one (2.9%) of these subjects (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 0.5-40.2; p = 0.1), respectively. Seropositive subjects were observed in 22 (6.9%) regular HCQ users and 24 (7.2%) household contacts (OR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6-1.9; p = 0.8). COVID-19-related symptoms occurred in 16 (72.7%) of the 22 patients and 12 (50%) of 24 household contacts (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 0.8-9.1; p = 0.1). Three patients (13.6%) were admitted to hospital, while one household contact (4.2%) was hospitalized (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 0.3-37.8; p = 0.2). Being on a regular treatment of colchicine or HCQ did not result in the prevention of COVID-19 or amelioration of its manifestations.

The relationship between serum A proliferation-inducing ligand and B-cell activating factor levels with disease activity and organ involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to investigate the association between serum B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) levels with disease activity and clinical findings in SLE patients. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with SLE and 27 healthy controls were included into the study. Serum BAFF and APRIL levels were measured by using ELISA. In 19 patients with active disease at the time of the assessment, BAFF/APRIL levels were reassessed after 6 months of follow-up and disease activity was evaluated by using SLEDAI-2K. The relationship between renal histopathology index scores and lupus nephritis (LN) classes with serum BAFF/APRIL levels was examined in 16 patients who had recent renal involvement and underwent biopsy during the study. RESULTS: Although both BAFF/APRIL levels were higher in patients with SLE compared to the control group (p < 0.001), no correlation was found between BAFF/APRIL levels and SLEDAI scores. Serum BAFF levels were higher in patients with renal disease activity (p = 0.01), and there was a significant correlation between APRIL levels and proteinuria (r = 0.42, p = 0.02). A weak inverse correlation was observed between BAFF and C3 levels (r = 0.25, p = 0.02). No correlation was found between BAFF/APRIL levels and renal SLEDAI scores, renal histopathology, activity, and chronicity index scores. In the active disease group after treatment, there was no significant change in serum BAFF levels, but a significant increase in serum APRIL levels was observed. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that both cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of SLE and that serum BAFF can be valuable as a biomarker in SLE especially in patients with renal activity.

The Effect of Suppressed Levels of Uninvolved Immunoglobulins on the Prognosis of Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: The majority of multiple myeloma (MM) patients have high levels of monoclonal immunoglobulin in the serum and/or urine and suppressed levels of the uninvolved immunoglobulins. The prognostic significance of this phenomenon has not been assessed sufficiently. In this study, our aim is to evaluate the prognostic significance of uninvolved immunoglobulin suppression measured by nephelometry in patients with new symptomatic MM and the association with other features of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2003 and February 2015, 137 patients who were referred for the treatment of newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma to the Hematology Department polyclinics of the Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine were prospectively included and had available pretreatment immunoglobulin levels measured by nephelometry. RESULTS: Suppression of at least one uninvolved immunoglobulin was observed in 87% of patients and this situation was slightly more common in patients with immunoglobulin A myeloma but had no statistical significance (p>0.05). Uninvolved immunoglobulin suppression was also more common among patients who had bone marrow plasma cell infiltration of ≥40% and presented with anemia and hypercalcemia (p<0.05). The overall survival time was shorter in patients with positive calcium-renal-anemia-bone criteria and International Staging System stage 3 compared with others (p<0.05). Factors that were independently associated with inferior survival in the multivariate analysis included patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min, age of >65 years, lactate dehydrogenase of >300 IU/L, bone marrow plasma cells of ≥40%, and ß2-microglobulin of >3.5 mg/dL (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, 13.1% of MM patients had preserved levels of uninvolved immunoglobulins. We observed that patients who had preserved uninvolved immunoglobulin levels had better treatment responses and better pathologic signs, but statistical significance could not be shown. Conversely, patients with suppression of even one of the uninvolved immunoglobulins had a shorter survival, but similarly, statistical significance could not be shown.